The Pauper format is vast with approximately 6500 available cards in the format. That's a lot of cards and so I thought it might be helpful to give you some direction by providing insight on some of the most popular decks.
There are many playable decks in Pauper and while, previously, paper pauper events were mostly local, we now have a high-profile event to use alongside MTGO events, which, until these tournaments, has been the primary way for determining Pauper's "meta."
Recently, the first Pauper MCQ took place with 186 entrants. This is insanely large for a paper Pauper event so along with popular online archetypes, we will address some that made Top 8 at this event.
Dimir Delver
Any article about Pauper archetypes needs to address the elephant in the room - Delver decks.

This is William Yoder's deck from the Mythic Championship Qualifier Los Angeles Top Eight. It's a great example of what, right now, is possibly the best deck in the whole format.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17Lands | 13Creatures | 30Other Spells |
| 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
Much like its legacy counterparts, delver decks in Pauper rely on sticking a game-ending threat, oftentimes the namesake Delver of Secrets, and using cheap interaction and powerful blue card selection to ensure that you can answer any answers/threats your opponent might put forward until your threat can close the game. These decks tend to heavily emphasize cheap spells and aggressive games and, for many magic players, are the quintessential example of "Tempo" in Magic.
Tempo decks, because of the tight line they walk between aggression and control are sometimes quite complicated to play but are very rewarding to play once you have the experience. If you decide Delver is your style, then be prepared to face a lot of mirrors, as Delver archetypes are considered by many the de facto best archetype in Pauper.

Bogles
Well I had an easy choice for which decklist to use as Max Forlibi took his build all the way to a first-place finish and will be going to Mythic Championship London.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18Lands | 11Creatures | 31Other Spells |
| 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 15 | 4 | 4 |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 2 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 |
The deck uses creatures with Hexproof and multiple aura enchantments to quickly beat down an opponent. multiple enchantments to batter down an opponent.
Bogles was one of the first decks I ever played in the format and gets a personal recommendation as a deck that's great to pick up and play.

Burn
Burn decks seem to exist in every format and as you add cards to the available card pool, Burn tends to gain some overall power. Josh Rose made Top Eight at the Mythic Championship Qualifier with this spicy deck.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18Lands | 8Creatures | 30Other Spells |
| 18 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 4 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 |
So, the deck runs as many different versions of
Burn is a great choice for a new player and one that has stood the test of time.

Tron
Tron decks are often at the very least considered in older formats and Pauper is no exception. I wouldn't normally recommend this deck to a new player. But there is one exception. If a player has played Tron decks before, then it might serve as a good starting point. Tron, for the uninitiated, is the trio of
Now, onto the example deck! Jason Ames made Top Eight at the Mythic Championship Qualifier with this.
So how does the deck work?
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23Lands | 15Creatures | 22Other Spells |
| 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 4 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | ||
The creatures all have utility bringing come into play effects onto your side. They can then be used repeatedly by

Affinity
Affinity is a name that strikes fear into many Magic players. It's an aggressive deck that revolves around artifact synergies and creatures that have their cost reduced based on the number of Artifacts in play.
Lollerstank is just one player who has shown the decks worth on MTGO, but here's his take on Affinity in pauper.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16Lands | 18Creatures | 26Other Spells |
| 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 4 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 2 |
We have highly efficient creatures to whittle away the opponent's life total and cards like

Slivers
Slivers Is one of the simplest decks to play and is also great fun.
Ixidor29 played this version in a Magic online league
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20Lands | 29Creatures | 11Other Spells |
| 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 7 | 4 | 4 |
| 6 | 4 | 4 |
| 1 | 4 | |
| 1 | 4 | |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 4 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | ||
So, the creatures are all Slivers and every Sliver improves all Slivers. So the deck functions by getting a critical mass of Slivers like

Mono Black Control
Mono Black Control is an archetype that has been popular throughout the history of magic dating back to
bdecker7649 used this version online to go 5-0 in a Pauper League.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23Lands | 3Creatures | 34Other Spells |
| 23 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 1 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | |
The deck uses
Mono Black Control has many faces and angles of attack so this list is not definitive but is good as it avoids using

Kuldotha Boros
Kuldotha Boros is a strange name, originating with Pauper decks using

Picture: Kuldotha Rebirth
Carvs has consistently gone 5-0 in Pauper leagues and this is one of his winning decks.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21Lands | 15Creatures | 24Other Spells |
| 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | |
Perhaps most interesting about this deck is the inclusion of the controversial
I'd highly recommend this deck as an entry point as it is easy to learn and should give you lots of positive early results.

Oops All Instants
The final deck I'm going to feature is a wild card. Steven Keys made Top Eight of the Mythic Championship Qualifier with his homebrew build.
| Maindeck | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22Lands | 12Creatures | 26Other Spells |
| 14 | 4 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| Sideboard | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 1 | ||
Every time you think the format is solved, someone will come along with something new to shake things up. I could totally see this deck seeing a ton more play over the coming weeks with the hive mind creating tons of offshoots and new variants of this deck.
The deck itself is a mono blue control with some interesting tempo effects built around faeries like

Decks I've Not Featured
The Pauper format is massive with an estimate of over twenty tournament playable decks, and I've barely touched the surface with this summary. There are other decks I could have featured and may well do so in the future which include Poison, Izzet Blitz, Inside Out Combo, Zombies and Familiars though for this article as I was aiming for newer players entering the format, I avoided several of the more complicated decks.
Conclusion
Pauper is a format that is inexpensive to play but with so many options of which deck to play, once you have a deck then you are set for some time and any new cards that are required will only ever be printed at common so easy to acquire.
I hope the article encourages you to the take part in the format going forward and that you find a deck you like.
Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily Cardmarket.
