The Most Interesting and Successful Decks from the Pioneer Pro Tour

After a long hiatus of paper Magic, the Pro Tour is back. Pro Tour Phyrexia took place February 17–19 at MagicCon: Philadelphia. It featured Draft and Pioneer. Let's discuss the Constructed metagame, win rates, and the most interesting decklists outside of the already much-publicized Top 8.

Day 1 Metagame

metagame

Wizards posted the whole metagame on the event coverage page, where you can also find all the archetypes in the "other" category. I think the top two decks were very predictable coming in. Typically, at this level pro players choose strategies that provide them with the most agency so that their Magic-skill superiority can shine through. Rakdos Midrange is a deck full of decisions and interaction, hence had been chosen the most.

Most surprisingly, the third most popular deck was Gruul Vehicles. This aggressive midrange archetype is a great way to go toe to toe with Rakdos while being able to put real pressure on more goldfishy decks. The rest of the top field was comprised of Lotus, Humans, Azorius Control. All in all, the percentage of stock decks chosen was high.

What certainly caught many people by surprise was that Izzet Creativity's presence in the field ended up comparable to that of Azorius Control, Humans, or Lotus. It was played by arguably the best pro team of all time. We saw players of the highest caliber in LSV, Gabriel Nassif, and Reid Duke wield this deck successfully.

The other category made up a fifth of the field. I would say this is a sweet spot when it comes to rogue strategies' representation, especially at that level. Let's look at the spiciest of them all next.

Spicy Lists

Izzet Mindsplice by Chris Botelho
Main DeckSideboard
  • 4
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2

I am beyond excited to see submitted at the Pro Tour level. This deck is basically Izzet Phoenix but without the Phoenixes and more top end. Apparatus discounts all the delve cards like or , which allows you to delve less when casting them or even naturally play them without the need to access the graveyard altogether. is another blue spell that really benefits from being cheaper.

Two copies of create powerful synergies with the aforementioned blue spells, as for a meager cost of two mana you get to copy them. In the late game, it won't be shocking to see just four mana paying for Iteration into Epiphany.

Azorius Powestone by Jeff Lin
Main DeckSideboard
  • 4
  •  
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
  •  
  • 2
  • 1
  • 4
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 4
  • 3
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 1

When it was posted that there was an Azorius Powerstone list, everybody yearned to get their hands on it. It is essentially a control deck with a heavy artifact subtheme. It runs the usual interaction suspects such as and with some spicy choice of countermagic in and .

The star of the show and its main win condition is , the 's older brother. Pioneer Constructed may not have , but it certainly has Constructs. Overall, the deck is an interesting blend between Azorius Control and artifacts.

Grinning Ignus Combo by Dimitar Erinin
Main DeckSideboard
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1
  •  
  • 4
  • 1
  • 4
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  • 1
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2

Combo is one of those decks that float under the radar, resurface from time to time, and go back into hiding. Seeing it registered at such an event gives me hope that we will see more of this sweet strategy.

The basic premise is that we keep recasting Ignus with the help of or and generate some kind of advantage that way. If we are even on mana, we can gain infinite life via or straight-up kill the opponent with . It's possible to net mana and start gaining more and more, at which point we can just cast a multitude of spells to overwhelm the opponent. Crucially, when looping with Monument, we get to rummage with every iteration, so we will find the missing piece for the win.

There were of course more interesting decks than the ones featured here. The event included Abzan Auras, Mardu Sacrifice, Combo, and . If you want to scour the lists yourself, check out the tournament's full deck archive.

Best Performing Pioneer Decks

Thanks to none other than Frank Karsten, we get to look at nonmirror win rates of all the decks registered at the Pro Tour. It is worth noting that not all the decks collected a sample sizeably enough to draw any conclusions. That is why I need to draw an arbitrary line in the sand and I do so at the match size of 40. With that out of the way, let us discuss the best decks.

One match shy of the desired sample size, Greasefang still is a popular enough deck in the metagame overall that I feel it should be mentioned. It sported a 67% win rate, which is shockingly high for the strategy. It's known for its glass-cannon nature with the possibility to play fair-ish games. At the same time, I've heard the sentiment numerous times that while the fair plan exists, it's rarely enough to actually get games across the finish line. The deck's biggest problems include graveyard hate and efficient point removal like or . Still, the deck won a big majority of its matches, which may speak to the pilots' prowess, downtick of hate, or both.

Not least, one group of pro players brought a version updated with a slice of delirium. Despite fueling , it is characterized by fewer self-mill than what stock lists run, no or . Instead it uses more Vehicles and more self-discard. Eli Loveman went 7-3 with it.

Abzan Greasefang by Eli Loveman
Main DeckSideboard
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  •  
  • 1
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  •  
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 4
  • 3
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 4

From among the three most played decks, each supplied a win rate below 50%. This is where the results are particularly reliable as sample sizes exceed 150 matches and even reach 220 when it comes to Rakdos. There are a few things that possibly happened here. The overrepresentation may indicate that a lot of players, including those less experienced, brought the deck, dragging the win rate down a bit. On top of that, those decks are a known quantity so the very best opponents knew exactly how to play against them and had a plan.

From the decks with 100+ matches, we saw positive win rates in Sacrifice, , , and Azorius Control. While I would love to give those decks proper credit for being new forces that need to be reckoned with, I cannot help but think that it was not decks per se but rather players who won the matches. It would seem from the data that Creativity is a new break-out tier one deck, yet the pilots are literal Hall of Famers, which naturally skews the interpretation, especially if you want to apply it at your local level.

All in all, it's always fascinating to look at exact numbers and try to mathematically figure out what you should play at your next RCQ. But between the sample sizes, pro teams, and overall specific field, they may be less reliable than we'd like.

Best Performing Pioneer Players

Player Record Match Win %
MORIYAMA, MASAHIDE 9-1 90.0%
Madsen, Benton 8-1 88.9%
Yasooka, Shota 6-1 85.7%
KONDO, SHOGO 8-2 80.0%
Lossett, Joe 8-2 80.0%
Nassif, Gabriel 8-2 80.0%
Sweetnam, Cameron 8-2 80.0%
Duke, Reid 7-2 77.8%
Matsuura, Takumi 7-2 77.8%
Steuer, Nathan 7-2-1

These are the players who went 70% or better in actual Pioneer Swiss rounds, excluding draft and awarded byes entirely. I am sure that no one is even remotely surprised to see names like Steuer, Duke, Nassif, or Yasooka among them. Let's take a look at the decks that they played.

These ten registered eight unique decks: Angels, Auras, Rakdos, Creativity, Lotus, Humans, Greasefang, and Green Devotion. The two decks that were played by two each were Creativity and Lotus. It seems evident that this micro-meta is very diverse and that there is a plethora of decks that one can play in Pioneer to come out on top. I reckon it's one of the features of nonrotating formats that players value the most. They want diversity in decks played, but, even more so, they need to know there is diversity in decks succeeding.

The most interesting of those mentioned here is the Angels list, which ran six mana Elves, a clean split between and . I assume that Moriyama recognized the clunkiness of the curve of the deck and decided to put the pedal to the metal on the acceleration front. Deploying one of your many three-drops on turn two, especially on the play, changes the dynamic completely and flips the script around. Of course going Elf into wasn't feasible before the last two sets added and to the format's card pool.

Selesnya Angels by Masahide Moriyama
Main DeckSideboard
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
  • 4
  •  
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1
  •  
  • 4
  • 1
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 3

The Top 8

The Day 1 and Day 2 struggles rewarded eight fortunate players with a chance to battle on the third day of competition. You can learn more about them and find their decklists here.

top 8 players

While influenced by the draft results, it is notable that none of the Top 8 players went worse than 7-3 in the Pioneer portion of the Swiss. From the initial 218 players, the following strategies rose to the very top: Enigmatic Fires, two copies of Creativity, two copies of Lotus Field, Selesnya Auras, Humans, and Rakdos Midrange.

They battled in a best-of-five format to determine the eventual winner. In a truly poetic fashion, the first post-hiatus paper Pro Tour was won by the nicest guy and arguably most respected player in the community, Reid Duke. Despite a multitude of achievements in this game, it was Reid's first actual Pro Tour win. To make it even more epic, Reid won the finals in the cleanest sweep imaginable, going 3-0 over the opponent.

Reid Duke, Pro Tour champion
Reid Duke, Pro Tour champion

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author, not of Cardmarket.